Sponsored
Sponsored

The Studies in Europe and the Energy Efficiency Guideline VDI 4707

Sponsored

Following research into elevator energy consumption, a voluntary guideline that defines elevator energy measurement procedures has been developed.

Urs Lindegger
Schindler Aufzüge AG, Switzerland

ABSTRACT

The trend towards sustainability and energy efficiency does not stop when it comes to elevators. The study by the Swiss federal office of energy in 2005 took a pioneer role in the ­energy consumption research of elevators. Within the European Commis­sion’s Intelligent Energy Europe Programme, the Energy-Efficient Elevators and Escalators project followed up the research.

Considering all the work available, the association of German engineers VDI has developed a voluntary guideline that defines energy measurement procedures and an energy efficiency label showing the relevant energy figures in an easily understandable manner.

1. INTRODUCTION

Global warming and its environmental impact is one of the major topics that we face today. People want to be aware of the cause, understand the situation, identify the major polluters and finally act to improve.

In 2005 as a consequence, elevators got into the focus of the Swiss federal institute of energy. After some discussion, it got decided that a research project has to be started to measure elevators in Switzerland and estimate the energy used by all installed elevators.

Following the work done in Switzerland, the Energy-Efficient ­Elevators and Escalators project supported by the European Commission’s Intelligent Energy Europe Programme, identified in 2010 the energy demand of elevators and escalators in Europe and its saving potential.

The association of German engineers VDI, published in 2009 a guideline to assess the energy efficiency of elevators. This guideline defines an energy label for elevators similar as known from other devices. It therefore identifies key figures such as standby demand and estimates a nominal yearly energy demand figure for an elevator.

2. MAIN BODY

The first question someone might ask is: How much energy uses my ­elevator per year? The only way to answer this question would be, attach an energy counter to the elevator and measure the energy consumed after one year. Then the answer could be: Last year your elevator used 830 kWh. With the energy price of €0.15 per kWh electricity; this ­results in €124.50. Next year it will be probably the same.

This approach is obviously not practical to get a quick answer and can be used just for already installed elevators with known traffic patterns. Maybe in the future, elevators could be equipped with individual energy meters, but this would take years until it could be realized.

Therefore methods had to be ­invented to assess energy demands of elevators. Those methods need to be practical. Practical means, it should be possible to perform an energy measurement in a one to two hour intervention on an individual customer elevator. Obviously it is not very practical to bring a couple of tons load to the customer site to perform measure­ments with a loaded elevator car. Luckily, due to the counter weight balancing on most elevators, a trip with an empty car, results in an extreme situation for the drive system and this situation can be used to analyze the ­energy performance. However special balanced elevators may require a loaded car to measure such extreme situations for the drive system.

Knowing how the elevator performs during single trips and making an assumption about expected traffic, it is possible to make yearly energy estimates.

Obviously those estimates can not be as precise as measuring the energy consumption of an elevator during a long period. However in most cases energy estimates are the only possible ways to give energy statements.

The study by the Swiss federal office of energy, the ­research project Energy-Efficient Elevators and Escalators, the VDI guideline and the work done in ISO/TC178 Lifts, escalators and moving walks (WG10 Energy efficiency) came all to the same conclusion that two key figures need to be defined:

  • Energy for a reference trip
  • Power used when standing still (Standby)

On installed elevators those two key figures can be verified by measurements.

For the reference trip, the energy will be measured while the empty car travels from the lowest floor to the top most floor and back.

Standby power is measured when the elevator is standing still. However a lot got discussed when and how this is measured. Taking a closer look shows that the standby power value is not constant: Elevators turn off the car light, the fans, remove force from the doors, charge emergency batteries, stop to have the dc link of the drives frequency converter charged, … .

Instead of considering every single effect and miss some unknown effects, it is more practical to measure the standby power value some minutes after a finished trip.

3. RESULTS

Around 100 elevators have been measured in the two public studies so far. Figures 1-2 data comes from a 630kg, 1m/s modernized traction elevator serving 5 floors in a school house with a rise of 12.6m.

The power curve (Figure 1) shows a reference trip from the lowest floor up to the top most and back.

Since the car is empty, the down trip has to lift the counterweight and uses up to 6kW. Power analyzers are the preferred instruments to measure such power curves with high dynamic power changes and currents that are not sinusoidal. If not adequate equipment is used, the measurement effort has no value, since the fundamental idea behind measurements is the following: When different people using different instruments measure the same elevator, all have to end up with almost identical values.

Energy is power over time, so the recorded power curve can be integrated to get an energy curve (Figure 2):

The energy used for this 67 second round trip is 22Wh. Assuming the price of €0.15 per kWh electricity; such a reference trip in a residential European building costs €0.0033. This shows that taking the stairs instead of the elevator, does not save a lot of energy.

EN81 elevators have also a main switch for car lighting and depending circuits. During the reference trip, the power value measured at this point is constantly 96W, since this value manly result from the car light. Considering the 67 second trip time, 1.8Wh additional energy is used in this circuit during the reference trip.

120W standby power on the main switch of the power circuit has been measured 5 minutes after the last trip. If the elevator is equipped with traditional lighting, the car light will still be turned on 5min after a trip and adding additionally 96W to the standby power. Unfortunately the studies in Europe showed, many elevators have the car lights turned on for 24 hours a day.

Switching the car light immediately off, would save ­energy, but would significantly reduce lifetime of the lamps (incandescent or florescent) and therefore have a negative impact in the overall environmental life cycle assessment of an elevator.

Common values to turn off the car light are in the area of 15 to 30 minutes. This parameter can easily be modified in the controller software, but requires detailed product knowledge and maybe even a special tool. People performing the energy measurements do not have this detailed product know how and would have to wait for an unknown time until the car light eventually turns off. Often and especially single elevators in residential buildings can not be taken out of service for a long time. Therefore the definition to measure standby 5min after the last trip is practical. This uncertainty in the behaviour of the car light and for the standby values in general, leads to higher standby figures. Since the energy calculations are using those figures, they will produce a pessimistic result.

Luckily, new technologies bring new solutions that allow switching off the car light as often as desired. Such technologies are: LED’s and compact fluorescent lamps with heavy duty switching durability.

4. DISCUSSION

The next step is: Take the figures from the measured single trips and use them to make the yearly energy estimate of the elevator. Again the yearly energy used by ­elevators can be divided into two parts:

  • Energy used to move the car
  • Energy used for standing still (Standby-Energy)

To estimate the energy used to move the car, the energy measurements of the reference trip have to be taken.

In the simplest case a reference trip with an empty car of a 50% balanced traction elevator can be measured. Since often no other measurements with different load and travel distance exist, assumptions and interpolations have to be made. Figure 3 illustrates the ­assumptions to get a simple mathematical model:

  • The energy for a reference trip is used just to lift the counterweight (Point 1).
  • Lowering the counterweight requires no energy (Point 2). For regenerative drive systems a negative value could be considered.
  • A balanced car does not use energy to move (Point 3)
  • A full loaded car uses the same energy for a reference trip as an empty car (Point 4 and 5).

The other load conditions and travel distances can be linear interpolated. Continued

To compare how accurate the simplified model is, more measurements with different load conditions and travel distances could be made. Theoretical every load condition and every travel distance could be measured and put into a matrix (Figure 4).

The energy to move from floor to floor might even ­depend on the specific floors. For a single load condition a matrix could be created (Figure 5).

Even doing all this effort, the biggest uncertainty to ­estimate the yearly energy still remains. It is how pas­sengers use the elevator. The proposed simplified model is therefore a good compromise between effort and ­accuracy.

The average trip uses average load in the car and ­travels an average distance. For a European residential 50% balanced traction elevator a simple traffic pattern can be assumed (Table 1): 

The average round trip (up trip and down trip = two trips) uses therefore:

100% * 50% + 50% * 30% + 50% * 10% = 70% energy of the reference trip.

For single elevators in European residential buildings the average travel distance can be considered as half the rise.

Since the reference trip contains two trips and the ­average trip distance is half the rise, the energy used for an average trip is ¼ of the energy of average round trip.

The yearly energy demand of a 50% balanced traction elevator can be estimated according the formula:

Etravel = ¼ n * Ereftrip * 0.7 (1)

Etravel yearly energy to travel

Ereftrip energy used for the reference trip

n number of trips per year

The standby energy demand can be calculated as follows:

Estby = Pstby * tstby (2)

tstby = 365days * (24hours – ttravel) (3)

Estby yearly energy for the standby

Pstby standby power

ttravel time during the year when the elevator 

travels

tstby time during the year when the elevator 

stands still

5. CONCLUSIONS

The studies in Switzerland, in the European Union and VDI 4707 used similar mathematical models to estimate the energy demand of the elevators.

The 2005 estimates for Switzerland showed that the approximately 150,000 lift systems in Switzerland consume around 300GWh per year, which is equivalent to 0.5% of the country’s electricity demand. Surprising was, that more than 50% of the energy got used just for standby. Often new elevators have more standby power than old ones. New elevators have a lot of standby consuming electronics to comply with today’s safety, accessibility and comfort requirements.

The European Energy-Efficient Elevators and Escalators project estimated 18,4TWh total electricity consumption for the elevators. 6,7TWh are in the residential sector, 10,9TWh in the tertiary sector and only 810GWh in the ­industrial sector. The project estimated also the savings potential considering Best Available Technologies (BAT) (Figure 6):

The BAT 1st Scenario shows what would be possible when all existing elevators would use today available technology. The BAT 2nd Scenario shows more a visionary view, it considers what would be possible if the elevators would have just 1W standby power.

6. VDI 4707

The association of German engineers VDI has considered the available research work and has published the guideline VDI 4707 that defines an energy label for lifts.

Standby and Travel have separate classifications (Table 2).

The Standby Class is directly assigned to the standby power value.

The energy for a reference trip depends on shaft length and rated load. To remove these variations, the energy for a reference trip is therefore divided through trip distance travelled and rated load before it is assigned to the ­Specific Travel Demand Class. The impact of load and traffic is considered using the load factor (see Table 1).

Having two classes might be difficult to handle. Therefore VDI 4707 has defined the Energy Efficiency Class of the elevator that combines the two classes. Low standby values are more important than very efficient drive systems for residential elevators that do not travel very frequent. However in buildings with high traffic, the opposite is true. Therefore VDI 4707 defines 5 usage categories (very seldom to very frequent use).

All the results and estimates are summarized on the VDI 4707 energy efficiency label (Figure 7).

Efficiency of an elevator

Often a question arises, what is the energy efficiency factor η of an elevator? Efficiency factors η have to be unit less where 100% means the ideal situation.

To lift mass, ηlift can be determined as:

ηlift = (m * gn * h) / Elift (4)

To lower the mass, energy can be regenerated and ηregen can be determined as:

ηregen = Eregen / (m * gn * h) (5)

The energy for the reference trip can be calculated as follows:

Ereftrip = Elift – Eregen = (m * gn * h) * (1/ηlift – ηregen) (6)

Since no energy is converted in the reference trip, the efficiency ηelevator would always be zero. Therefore it makes sense to use instead of efficiency ηelevator the two efficiency factors ηlift and ηregen.

Elift Energy to lift the mass

Ereftrip Energy for a reference trip

Eregen Regenerated Energy

gn Gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s2)

h Rise of the elevator

m Mass difference to be moved (counter weight minus empty car)

ηlift Efficiency factor to lift mass

ηregen Efficiency factor to regenerate energy

7. REFERENCES

Nipkow, J. (2005). Publication 250057. Electricity demand and saving ­potential of elevators. Swiss Federal Office of Energy. 44pp

(2009). VDI-guideline 4707. Lifts Energy efficiency, Verein Deutscher ­Ingenieure. 28pp

Almeida, A. (2010). ENERGY EFFICIENT ELEVATORS & ESCALATORS, ­Estimation of savings. Intelligent Energy Europe, 15pp

Related Tags
Sponsored
Sponsored
Urs Lindegger

Urs Lindegger

Urs Lindegger has been employed as electronic design engineer in the R&D department of Schindler elevators. After 16 years of development activities in various locations and positions, he moved to the code and standards department. He was member of ISO/TC178 and participated in different working groups as WG10 (Energy efficiency). He was involved in the 2005 study from the Swiss federal office of energy identifying energy consumption of elevators. He participated in the creation the guideline VDI 4707 Lifts, Energy efficiency. As chairman of the ELA working group Ecology and Energy he contributed to the work of the European study Energy-Efficient Elevators and Escalators.

Elevator World | April 2011 Cover

Flipbook

Sponsored
Sponsored